ATTACK · CALCULATION · COORDINATION

Checks reveal a queen-winning fork

Smyslov keeps the initiative through a sequence of sacrifices. Vasily Smyslov vs Zoltán Ribli, 1983.

20 minute studyAdvanced41 moves4 moments to think
Zoltán RibliWhite to move
Vasily SmyslovStarting position
← → moves · F to flip
Legal moves only. Explore freely in Replay.
Read this position & keyboard help

Standard starting position. White to move.

Use left/right arrows for moves, Home/End for start/end, F to flip. Enter a legal move above without using the board. Space starts or pauses autoplay when the board is focused. Draw arrows with right-drag; user drawings are separate from teaching arrows.

THE STORY BEGINS

Every piece has a part to play.

Smyslov’s fifth game against Ribli in their 1983 Candidates semifinal features an exposed king, several offered pieces and a final fork of king and queen. The attack is useful precisely because the sacrifices need calculation: Black has checking resources too. Follow how the queen, knight and advancing d-pawn create forcing moves together.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41.
GAME BALANCE · WHITE’S PERSPECTIVE+0.37
Accessible evaluation values & provenance

Stockfish 17.1 · 75,000 nodes per position; 1,000,000 at key moments. Actual depth 12–20. Positive centipawns favour White; mate scores remain separate. Selective search is evidence, not proof.

Download complete engine evidence

The story behind the game

Smyslov’s fifth game against Ribli in their 1983 Candidates semifinal features an exposed king, several offered pieces and a final fork of king and queen. The attack is useful precisely because the sacrifices need calculation: Black has checking resources too. Follow how the queen, knight and advancing d-pawn create forcing moves together.

Take these ideas to your next game

  1. Check the defender’s forcing replies before offering a piece.
  2. A piece can create threats while another is under attack.
  3. Pawn advances with check can move a defender onto a fork square.
  4. Look for a fork after the defender blocks a checking line.
Read the complete annotated game

Full game transcript, including the result and the answers. Original explanations by chessgames.info; game score from the sources below.

1 . d4
1 … Nf6
2 . Nf3
2 … e6
3 . c4
3 … d5
4 . Nc3
4 … c5
5 . cxd5
5 … Nxd5
6 . e3
6 … Nc6
7 . Bd3
7 … Be7
8 . O-O
8 … O-O
9 . a3
9 … cxd4
10 . exd4
10 … Bf6
11 . Qc2
11 … h6
12 . Rd1
12 … Qb6
13 . Bc4
13 … Rd8
14 . Ne2
14 … Bd7
15 . Qe4
15 … Nce7
16 . Bd3
16 … Ba4
17 . Qh7+
17 … Kf8
18 . Re1
18 … Bb5
19 . Bxb5
19 … Qxb5
20 . Ng3
20 … Ng6
21 . Ne5
21 … Nde7
22 . Bxh6

Bxh6 removes a pawn near Black’s king while offering the bishop to the g7-pawn. Black answers by taking the knight on e5 rather than the bishop. White must continue with active threats because several pieces are exposed. The point is to calculate the whole forcing sequence, including Black’s checks, rather than treating the first sacrifice as sufficient.

22 … Nxe5
23 . Nh5

dxe5 is the strongest saved candidate and removes Black’s central knight. The historical Nh5 kept attacking chances, but the saved comparison prefers dxe5 by more than the exercise threshold. After a bishop recapture, Nh5 can still appear later. Move order matters: calculate the central capture before committing the other knight to the kingside.

23 … Nf3+
24 . gxf3
24 … Nf5
25 . Nxf6
25 … Nxh6
26 . d5
26 … Qxb2
27 . Qh8+
27 … Ke7
28 . Rxe6+

Rxe6+ removes the e6-pawn while forcing Black to answer a check. The recorded f-pawn capture opens the way to Qxg7+. Black blocks with a knight, after which White’s d-pawn advances with check. The offered rook changes the king’s cover and the location of its defenders; the saved lines show the concrete cost and benefit.

28 … fxe6
29 . Qxg7+
29 … Nf7
30 . d6+
30 … Rxd6
31 . Nd5+

Nd5+ forks the king on e7 and queen on b2. Black takes the knight with the rook in the score, but White’s queen then takes the queen on b2. The preceding pawn check drew that rook to d6. Track the sequence of forcing moves backward: each check prepared the geometry of the final fork.

31 … Rxd5
32 . Qxb2
32 … b6
33 . Qb4+
33 … Kf6
34 . Re1
34 … Rh8
35 . h4
35 … Rhd8
36 . Re4
36 … Nd6
37 . Qc3+
37 … e5
38 . Rxe5
38 … Rxe5
39 . f4
39 … Nf7
40 . fxe5+
40 … Ke6
41 . Qc4+

Result: 1-0. The recorded score ends here; it does not imply checkmate.

Think through the turning points

Move 22: Offer the bishop near the king

Which bishop capture removes the pawn on h6? In the game: Bxh6. Bxh6 removes a pawn near Black’s king while offering the bishop to the g7-pawn. Black answers by taking the knight on e5 rather than the bishop. White must continue with active threats because several pieces are exposed. The point is to calculate the whole forcing sequence, including Black’s checks, rather than treating the first sacrifice as sufficient.

Engine-supported alternatives

Bxh6 Rxd4 Nh5 Bxe5 Rxe5 Nxe5 Qxg7+ Ke8 Nf6+ Kd8 Qf8+ Kc7 · +2.66 · depth 20

Nh5 Nxe5 · +2.06 · depth 20

b3 Rxd4 Nxg6+ Nxg6 a4 Qa5 Ba3+ Be7 Bb2 Rad8 Bxd4 Rxd4 · +0.02 · depth 19

Move 23: Capture before continuing the attack

Instead of the historical Nh5, which pawn capture removes the knight on e5? In the game: Nh5. dxe5 is the strongest saved candidate and removes Black’s central knight. The historical Nh5 kept attacking chances, but the saved comparison prefers dxe5 by more than the exercise threshold. After a bishop recapture, Nh5 can still appear later. Move order matters: calculate the central capture before committing the other knight to the kingside.

Engine-supported alternatives

dxe5 Bxe5 Nh5 Nf5 Bg5 Nh6 h4 Rac8 Bxh6 gxh6 Qxh6+ Ke8 · +2.47 · depth 20

Nh5 Nf3+ · +1.92 · depth 20

a4 Nf3+ gxf3 Qxb2 Be3 Ng6 f4 Rxd4 Rab1 Qc2 Rbc1 Qxa4 · +0.82 · depth 19

Move 28: Remove the pawn with check

Which rook capture on e6 gives check and opens another queen entry? In the game: Rxe6+. Rxe6+ removes the e6-pawn while forcing Black to answer a check. The recorded f-pawn capture opens the way to Qxg7+. Black blocks with a knight, after which White’s d-pawn advances with check. The offered rook changes the king’s cover and the location of its defenders; the saved lines show the concrete cost and benefit.

Engine-supported alternatives

Rxe6+ fxe6 Qxg7+ Nf7 d6+ Rxd6 Nd5+ Rxd5 Qxb2 Rg8+ Kh1 b6 · +3.28 · depth 16

Qxg7 Qxf6 · -0.54 · depth 16

Ne8 Rxe8 Qh7 Qf6 Rab1 b6 Qe4 Qg6+ Kh1 · -3.15 · depth 15

Move 31: Fork after the blocking capture

Black’s rook has captured the d-pawn. Which knight check also attacks the queen on b2? In the game: Nd5+. Nd5+ forks the king on e7 and queen on b2. Black takes the knight with the rook in the score, but White’s queen then takes the queen on b2. The preceding pawn check drew that rook to d6. Track the sequence of forcing moves backward: each check prepared the geometry of the final fork.

Engine-supported alternatives

Nd5+ Rxd5 Qxb2 b6 Re1 Rc5 Qb3 Rg8+ Kh1 Rg6 f4 Rf6 · +3.06 · depth 20

Nh5 Qxg7+ Nxg7 Rg8 Kf1 Rxg7 Rb1 Rd7 Ke2 Nd6 a4 b6 · -6.76 · depth 19

Ne8 Qxg7+ Nxg7 Rg8 Kf1 Rxg7 Rb1 Rd7 h4 Nd6 a4 Rd8 · -6.84 · depth 19

A CONNECTED IDEA

Calculate the reply to a sacrifice

Smyslov’s offered pieces work only with concrete follow-up checks. Compare Kasparov’s rook offer and list the defender’s forcing replies before judging either attack.

Try it in A king across the board →

Pass the game on.

A good idea is even better shared.

Position images download as SVG. Exact links use saved, validated variations. Unsaved exploration links return to the main-game position.