COORDINATION · PIECE ACTIVITY · CALCULATION

A rook offer for connected threats

Capablanca combines a queen, bishop and knight against Alekhine. José Raúl Capablanca vs Alexander Alekhine, 1927.

18 minute studyIntermediate42 moves4 moments to think
Alexander AlekhineWhite to move
José Raúl CapablancaStarting position
← → moves · F to flip
Legal moves only. Explore freely in Replay.
Read this position & keyboard help

Standard starting position. White to move.

Use left/right arrows for moves, Home/End for start/end, F to flip. Enter a legal move above without using the board. Space starts or pauses autoplay when the board is focused. Draw arrows with right-drag; user drawings are separate from teaching arrows.

THE STORY BEGINS

Every piece has a part to play.

An early exchange sacrifice reshapes the third game of the 1927 championship. White obtains active minor pieces and a queen that can attack both flanks. The later knight capture on g7 is part of that coordination, rather than an isolated combination. Compare each material decision with the squares White’s pieces gain.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42.
GAME BALANCE · WHITE’S PERSPECTIVE+0.37
Accessible evaluation values & provenance

Stockfish 17.1 · 75,000 nodes per position; 1,000,000 at key moments. Actual depth 13–245. Positive centipawns favour White; mate scores remain separate. Selective search is evidence, not proof.

Download complete engine evidence

The story behind the game

An early exchange sacrifice reshapes the third game of the 1927 championship. White obtains active minor pieces and a queen that can attack both flanks. The later knight capture on g7 is part of that coordination, rather than an isolated combination. Compare each material decision with the squares White’s pieces gain.

Take these ideas to your next game

  1. Evaluate an exchange offer with the follow-up capture.
  2. A central bishop can gain time against a king.
  3. An active knight can connect threats on both flanks.
  4. Check the queen’s entry squares before simplifying.
Read the complete annotated game

Full game transcript, including the result and the answers. Original explanations by chessgames.info; game score from the sources below.

1 . d4
1 … Nf6
2 . Nf3
2 … b6
3 . g3
3 … Bb7
4 . Bg2
4 … c5
5 . O-O
5 … cxd4
6 . Nxd4
6 … Bxg2
7 . Kxg2
7 … d5
8 . c4
8 … e6
9 . Qa4+
9 … Qd7
10 . Nb5
10 … Nc6
11 . cxd5
11 … exd5
12 . Bf4
12 … Rc8
13 . Rc1
13 … Bc5
14 . b4

b4 attacks the bishop and prepares a tactical change. Alekhine accepts the pawn with the bishop in the recorded game. White then has a capture on c6 that changes the material balance. Evaluate the pawn offer together with that follow-up, rather than treating it as an isolated attempt to gain time.

14 … Bxb4
15 . Rxc6

Rxc6 offers the exchange to remove a central defender. The recorded sequence continues with Black’s rook recapture and White’s queen taking the bishop on b4. Count the bishop as well as the knight and rook. White’s active queen and remaining minor pieces are part of the assessment after the immediate captures.

15 … Rxc6
16 . Qxb4
16 … Ne4
17 . Nd2
17 … Nxd2
18 . Qxd2
18 … O-O
19 . Rd1
19 … Rc5
20 . Nd4
20 … Re8
21 . Nb3
21 … Rcc8
22 . e3
22 … Qa4
23 . Qxd5
23 … Rc2
24 . Rd2
24 … Rxa2
25 . Rxa2
25 … Qxa2
26 . Qc6
26 … Rf8
27 . Nd4
27 … Kh8
28 . Be5

Be5 attacks g7 and brings the bishop toward the king. Black blocks the diagonal with f6. White’s knight then reaches e6, where it can threaten kingside squares. Follow the bishop and knight as a pair: the centralization matters because it improves the next threats, not because a check is always best by itself.

28 … f6
29 . Ne6
29 … Rg8
30 . Bd4
30 … h6
31 . h4
31 … Qb1
32 . Nxg7

Nxg7 opens further possibilities around Black’s king. The knight is supported by White’s bishop on d4 along the d4–g7 diagonal. Black’s queen must consider both the knight and the pawn advance h5. Compare the saved lines before deciding which apparent captures of the knight are actually safe.

32 … Qg6
33 . h5
33 … Qf7
34 . Nf5
34 … Kh7
35 . Qe4
35 … Re8
36 . Qf4
36 … Qf8
37 . Nd6
37 … Re7
38 . Bxf6
38 … Qa8+
39 . e4
39 … Rg7
40 . Bxg7
40 … Kxg7
41 . Nf5+
41 … Kf7
42 . Qc7+

Result: 1-0. The recorded score ends here; it does not imply checkmate.

Think through the turning points

Move 14: Challenge the bishop

Which pawn advance attacks the bishop on c5? In the game: b4. b4 attacks the bishop and prepares a tactical change. Alekhine accepts the pawn with the bishop in the recorded game. White then has a capture on c6 that changes the material balance. Evaluate the pawn offer together with that follow-up, rather than treating it as an isolated attempt to gain time.

Engine-supported alternatives

b4 · +1.50 · depth 20

Rxc5 bxc5 Nd6+ Ke7 Nc3 Rb8 e4 Rb4 Qd1 Rd4 Nf5+ Qxf5 · +0.65 · depth 20

Nc7+ Ke7 Na6 Nd4 Qxd7+ Kxd7 Nc3 Rhe8 e3 Ne6 Nb5 Nxf4+ · +0.58 · depth 20

Move 15: Remove the c6 defender

Which rook capture removes the knight on c6? In the game: Rxc6. Rxc6 offers the exchange to remove a central defender. The recorded sequence continues with Black’s rook recapture and White’s queen taking the bishop on b4. Count the bishop as well as the knight and rook. White’s active queen and remaining minor pieces are part of the assessment after the immediate captures.

Engine-supported alternatives

Rxc6 Rxc6 Qxb4 Ne4 f3 g5 Be5 f6 Bd4 Nc5 Bf2 Ne6 · +2.49 · depth 20

Nc7+ Rxc7 Bxc7 Bc5 Bf4 h5 h4 O-O Nd2 Re8 Re1 d4 · +0.36 · depth 20

Nd2 Nh5 Be3 O-O Nd4 Bc5 N2b3 Ne5 Nxc5 bxc5 Qxd7 Nxd7 · +0.09 · depth 20

Move 28: Centralize with tempo

Which bishop move attacks the pawn on g7? In the game: Be5. Be5 attacks g7 and brings the bishop toward the king. Black blocks the diagonal with f6. White’s knight then reaches e6, where it can threaten kingside squares. Follow the bishop and knight as a pair: the centralization matters because it improves the next threats, not because a check is always best by itself.

Engine-supported alternatives

e4 · +2.51 · depth 20

h4 Qa6 Qd7 Qc8 Qxa7 Qa8+ Qxa8 Rxa8 Bc7 Ra6 Kf3 Kg8 · +2.20 · depth 20

Be5 Qa5 Bd6 Rg8 e4 Qg5 Nf5 Qf6 Qb7 Qe6 Ba3 a5 · +2.12 · depth 20

Move 32: Take on g7

Which knight capture removes the pawn on g7? In the game: Nxg7. Nxg7 opens further possibilities around Black’s king. The knight is supported by White’s bishop on d4 along the d4–g7 diagonal. Black’s queen must consider both the knight and the pawn advance h5. Compare the saved lines before deciding which apparent captures of the knight are actually safe.

Engine-supported alternatives

Nxg7 Rxg7 Qxf6 Qe4+ Kg1 Qg4 Qxh6+ Kg8 Bxg7 Qxg7 Qxg7+ Kxg7 · +4.32 · depth 21

e4 Qd3 e5 fxe5 Bxe5 Qg6 h5 Qf7 Nxg7 Rxg7 Qxh6+ Kg8 · +2.77 · depth 21

g4 Qg6 Kg3 Qf7 f4 Qe8 Qd5 Qa4 Qf3 Qc2 f5 b5 · +2.06 · depth 21

A CONNECTED IDEA

An exchange offer needs a useful square

Compare Capablanca’s capture on c6 with Karpov’s rook offer on d5. Identify the piece that recaptures and explain which new squares justify considering the offer.

Try it in Clear the h-file, then break the centre →

Pass the game on.

A good idea is even better shared.

Position images download as SVG. Exact links use saved, validated variations. Unsaved exploration links return to the main-game position.